OPINION
Bring back the trains, fast
  By Jane Holtz Kay
TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2001
Christian Science Monitor

Winglock, gridlock. Shrinking mobility, rising pollution. With airport
congestion provoking travelers, gas prices agitating drivers, and six-hour
rush hours in some cities, alternatives to auto-air dominance have gained
appeal. And, as Amtrak struggles to push its high-speed rail initiative
through Congress, the question should not be "Can we build an iron
Interstate?" or "Can we get the nation back on track?" but "How can we do so
quickly?"

For many, the immobility and environmental malaise of US transportation have
begun to create a new constituency for just such a civilizing rail network.
Into the void between today's clogged, toxic travel and sustainable
transportation, comes a new bill: the High-Speed Rail Investment Act of
2001, introduced in the House June 27, now with 129 cosponsors. Designed to
add trains, speed up trains, and lay track, its demands - $12 billion in
bonds over 10 years - seem trifling compared with sums for this year alone
for roads ($31 billion) and airports ($17 billion).

In this era of environmental and energy concerns, rail is growing across the
country. Funded mostly by state and local support, light rail has been a
success story in improbable places. Freight rail, too, has advanced, cutting
down on trucks clunking through neighborhoods and choking highways. But
despite Amtrak's increased ridership, passenger trains have had tougher
going.

This year, on Amtrak's 30th birthday, it is time for passenger rail to get
away from choochoo status in congressional quarters. People, politicians,
and rail professionals know it. For all the inequities in funding, train
managers at the recent American Public Transportation Association conference
in Boston reported progress and recharged commitment to corridors of high-
(or higher-) speed rail corridors in the face of clogged runways and runaway
auto congestion.

The three high-speed initiatives (Boston-Washington, the Midwest, and West
Coast) are all advancing. Amtrak's Acela trips grow, serving the Boston-New
York nexus and extending to Washington, plus the increasingly active
Southern states. The Midwest initiative, centered in Chicago, has begun to
be fulfilled.

In the West, the Eugene, Ore.,-Washington State-Vancouver, British Columbia,
line is expanding, while California has grand plans to further its San
Diego-Los Angeles-Sacramento corridor, despite the state's depleted coffers.

The market is promising. Since 30 percent of all airport hub flights go just
500 miles, such high-speed trains could get traffic out of the air and off
the roads.

Given meager federal aid - the $12 billion in bonds being sought, plus a
scant $521 million grant from capital funds - passenger trains could begin
to become on-time alternatives with more cars, more tracks, and improved
signaling.

Not only in quality of movement, but in quality of the environment, such
improved rail could beat the skies and surface roads. As concerns about
energy and global warming grow, trains could serve to reduce US greenhouse
gas emissions - 33 percent of which come from motor vehicles. Likewise,
increased rail use could shrink the mounting airplane emissions in the upper
atmosphere, predicted by the Worldwatch Institute to become ever more
deadly.

Less positively, Amtrak's number could be up in fiscal year 2003, when it is
mandated to be operationally self-sufficient. Rail, unlike any other
infrastructure, public service, or transportation project in the world's
industrial nations, is required to practice "capitalism." That financial
demand does not apply to the airplane and highway agencies practicing
public- service "socialism," overfeeding at the federal trough.

The history behind rail's lagging lies in highway handouts, vast multiples
going to roads instead of rails. While European lines went from postwar
devastation to rapid on-time fleets via national support (plus gas-tax
penalties to the car), the US headed toward auto-air dependency, subsidizing
road-building and oil-buying, and depriving the train.

Broke and broken-down, the nation's passenger rail service caved.

When Amtrak took $2 billion from the feds four years ago, it was forced to
agree to "work more like a commercial business," as Amtrak president George
Warrington recently put it. It would behave like no other transportation
mode, from roads to streetcars to buses. It would behave as no industrial
nation's rail has behaved.

Now, however, America and Amtrak are on the verge of change. The time has
come to treat rail like its auto-air counterparts. The politics around the
new bill's requests are promising but not assured. Will Congress go for the
bonds? Will states and communities contribute more? Questions remain. What
is clear is that this could - and should - be the moment for a new era of
rail mobility.

. Jane Holtz Kay, an architecture and planning critic, is author of 'Asphalt
Nation: How the Automobile Took Over America and How We Can Take It Back'
(University of California, 1998).
=======

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. **



For more Aviation related information see: http://www.us-caw.org